Archive for the ‘Protecting Tenants At Foreclosure’ Category

Protecting Tenants Legislation Is Extended Though 2014 With Important Clarification Added

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Protecting Tenants At ForeclosureThe financial reform bill passed by Congress last week will extend for two full years the legislation passed in 2009 that provided tenants in foreclosed properties the opportunity to stay through the duration of their lease.  The Protecting Tenants At Foreclosure Act (PFTA) allows all tenants to stay in the home for 90 days after foreclosure or for the duration of their verified lease.  This law was one of the most significant changes to how foreclosures are processed of all laws enacted over the last couple of years.  Many homes that are occupied and foreclosed happen to have tenant occupants.  The former practice was to give the tenant a very short window to move after foreclosure.  This is no longer the case.  I have also posted here the surprize benefits some banks have found in having certain foreclosed homes occupied.

The two biggest challenges we have seen in following this law has been obtaining the lease that a tenant claims exists and subsequently having the bank’s law firm provide us confirmation as to its terms or a decision it is invalid.  This time frame seems to be manipulated by advised tenants realizing that the actual start date to the 90 day mandatory period to vacate the property seemed to be interpreted in different ways by different lenders.  This resulted in the second biggest issue as to whether the tenant’s rights under this law started at foreclosure or notice of the foreclosure and advise of their rights.  Fortunately, the new law clears this matter up by stating the 90 day period begins with the completed title transfer to the foreclosing party.  Specifically:

“The date of a notice of foreclosure shall be deemed to be the date on which complete title to a property is transferred to a successor entity or person as a result of an order of a court or pursuant to provisions in a mortgage, deed of trust, or security deed.’’

Additionally, further clarification is provided that states any lease or tenancy created prior to the change of title as a result of foreclosure is protected by the law.  Unfortunately, there is not an obvious way to attack the well-advised tenant who is enters into a  fully documented, long term lease  just prior to the foreclosure date.  These leases will have to be honored and will likely continue the need for banks to hire property managers to execute the lease and collect the rents.

Unexpected Benefit From Protecting Tenants At Foreclosure Act

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

I am hearing and reading that certain banks are actually turning the Protecting Tenants At Foreclosure Act (PTFA) to their advantage.  I have not actually experienced ths but it makes sense to me.

PTFA allows a tenant to stay in a foreclosed property for a minimum of 90 days after being notified of foreclosure.  If they can provide a valid lease, they can stay through the term of the lease.  This issue is creating all kinds of issues for banks..with most that we work for taking the approach of trying to buy a tenant out so that they waive their rights under PTFA.

Apparently, in some areas, banks are finding actually having a tenant in the property is helping the marketing and keeping the costs of management down.  Makes perfect sense.  Of course, we need to assume we have a good tenant, which PTFA helps determine by requiring a legitimate lease.  Right away they are likely keeping the heat on and not letting the home deteriorate as fast as it does when left vacant.  Most tenants actually do care and will keep a home in better shape than the alternative.  This can reduce maintennace costs.

The surprize benefit is that banks are learning that if the home has a paying tenant, that insists on the bank honoring their lease, the property has more value to prospective investment purchasers.  Investors are attracted to homes already leased and the idea that possibly they can negotiate a new lease with the tenant is actually allowing these homes to hold value.

As far as I can tell the part that is causing banks fits is they have no idea how to handle property management and related issues such as emergency repairs and rent collection.  There are companies that have sprung up offering these services on a national scale.  All of them are basically built on the national property preservation model..one office managing lots of contractors in the field on a national level.  The problem with this is there are to many hands in a small pie and there are real people involved (the tenants).  Property management handled with this model is not a long term solution.  It is the easy one for the lender as it limits their point of contact.  I can’t blame them for that.

Yet, if good property management of properties with tenants will preserve value and potentially assist in resale…why shortcut the effort with the wholesale approach currently being utilized?  I would encourage the banks to seek out strong local companies that are already familiar with REO, and established in offering property management services to assist in these specific situations.   It appears the returns are well worth not taking short cuts!