Posts Tagged ‘short sales’

Fannie and Freddie Release Short Sale Guidelines

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

When the original government sponsored short sale program, known as HAFA, was released there was no such program for Fannie or Freddie.  Considering the volume of loans owned or serviced by these entities, there was a collective groan from the masses wondering when the government’s own agencies would release a program that was being encouraged on private entities.  This week, that day came.  As one of the most knowledgeable people in America on short sales, Tim Burrell has written an excellent piece  describing the good and bad of these programs.  As I have said before, any organized program is better than no program.   Only time will tell if people struggling to make a mortgage payment feel a short sale offered un this manner provided a way out of their personal difficulties.

If you are so inclined, I am also posting the Fannie and Freddie short sale guidelines for your more in-depth review.  If you have a short sale that you would like to discuss, contact me at joel@wilmothgroup.com.

So You Want To Buy A Foreclosure?

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

Did somebody (late night television?) convince you that now is the time to get in on the greatest investment opportunity since gold?  Well, just like gold, there is/was an opportunity.  The question now is has the ship already sailed?

The reason for this question lies in the unreasonable returns potential buyers of foreclosures are seeking.  Even owner occupant buyers have it in their heads that they can purchase a foreclosure and immediately see 20% appreciation.  There are several problems with this line of thinking.

The market does not lie. 

There are some big questions about the future.

My comment on “the market does not lie” is based in the reality that when a home is priced below market we see multiple offers.  Makes sense.  More than one person sees the value versus the list price.  What ensues though is a process called “highest and best” that usually ends up with the winning offer getting the home very close to what we believed originally to be the correct value.  The market does not lie.  That is what is so great about “free markets”.  Real estate sales are very much a free-supply/demand market.

The future is a question because nobody, and I mean nobody, has their arms around the amount of foreclosure inventory that is in existence or is still to occur.  You may have heard of the shadow inventory of foreclosures?  This is a reference to the large number of homeowners who are either not making payments, being given modifications that may ultimately default, trying for a short sale, or are just struggling-in addition to the existing defaulted inventory of homes.   Many homes in default and vacant have not been foreclosed on.  The more of these homes that hit the market, the more there is a moderating force on home values.  I continue to see homes sell for a value far below other traditional sales on the same street.  One foreclosure sale can be overlooked as to value.  Several foreclosures, defaults, possible defaults and the market may not ignore.  Remember value, as objectively determined by reviewing recent comparable sales, is not the same thing as what the market will pay.  Uncertainty still is a big factor in what the market will pay.

If you want to buy a foreclosure..time to learn all about the many ways homes become a foreclosure.   CNNMoney.com published an article this week that covers the three ways a home in default can be purchased.  All are relevant and the article is worth your time to review.   It use to be that 90% of default homes were sold in the REO stage (my estimate).  Today we see an increasing percentage occuring in Pre-Foreclosure.  These are usually called short sales because the mortgage is more than the market will pay.  Sheriff sales are very tough and very risky.  Better know what you are doing and have ample cash before trying that game.

The Mystery Of Credit Scores and Default

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

A very interesting article was pointed out to me yesterday.  Published at CNNMoney.com, there is a run down of how defaulting on your mortgage is going to affect your credit score.  With the government encouraging homeowners to go for short sales or deed in lieu programs, one of the rarely talked about paths to these programs is you really need to be struggling to make your payment.   Struggling means late, partial payments, or maybe just stopped making payment.  I know people that have good credit but feel like they will never get out from an upside down mortgage.  At the advise of some well meaning people, they are now trashing their credit scores in order to qualify for one of the new government plans.

In the past, it was hard to define just how much damage these types of decisions were going to make to somebody’s credit score.   The referenced article states Fair Issac, the inventor of the FICO score commonly referred to as your credit score (by the way this is just one of several different credit scores) has provided estimates of the point declines these actions will cause.

Here is the average hit your credit will take:

30 days late: 40 – 110 points

90 days late: 70 – 135 points

Foreclosure, short sale or deed-in-lieu: 85 – 160

Bankruptcy: 130 – 240

As to the old theory that a short sale will not hurt your credit as much as a foreclosure, I was surprized to learn the following:

Mortgage borrowers can lose their homes three basic ways: a foreclosure; a short sale, where the home is sold for less than than is owed and the bank  forgives the difference; or a deed-in-lieu, in which the borrower gives back the property and the bank again forgives any unpaid balance.

Maxine Sweet, vice president for public education at Experian, one of the nation’s main credit bureaus said credit bureaus generally slash scores equally for those three resolutions to someone losing their home. The important factor, she said, is that “it’s reported that you paid less on a settled account.”

Some borrowers may think that because they never missed a payment, they can “walk away” from their homes with relatively little impact on scores. Not true. “When a deed-in-lieu or short sale is reported as a partial payment, it’s treated as a serious delinquency,” Watts said, “just like a foreclosure.”

Even if borrowers made payments faithfully for years before short selling or doing a deed-in-lieu, their credit score will still take a hit. The total decline will run about 85 points for the 680 score borrower to as much as 160 for the 780 score.

So, the expectation should be that your credit is going to suffer no matter which resolution course is chosen.  The world today though is making it much less of a stigma, and the doors for future home lending are being re-opened much quicker for short sales and deeds in lieu.  So, avoiding foreclosure continues to be the most favorable option.   Just don’t expect your credit score to confirm that.

New Help For Short Sales? Maybe…

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Unlike the HAMP modification program announced by the government last spring and supposed to be available immediately to borrowers eligible for a modification, the new Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives  (HAFA) program has had time for implementation.  The program was announced in May 2009 and began being offered by servicers last week.  The HAFA program is the first time a standardization of procedures have been created to create a short sale transaction.   Unfortunately, the two largest owners of loans in America (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) for some reason are not participants.  I find this a little odd since they are now fully owned and run by the same government offering incentives for short sales through HAFA.   I have been told for some time now both entities will be announcing their own short sales incentive plans in the near future.  Unless I missed it, that has not occurred yet.

As somebody who has been actually creating short sales for distressed homeowners since 1996, I find the ideas of this program noble and I do hope they create a model that can be duplicated by Fannie and Freddie.  At this point it is to early to tell if HAFA will work.  I can tell you that anything that creates a process within servicers for reviewing and approving/rejecting short sales will be an improvement…and I mean anything.  I have always supported the idea that contract law requires a borrower to repay the amount borrowed per the terms of the contract.   Unlike programs that force mortgage holders to take haircuts on balances or waive interest due, short sales are actually a business decision made within the free market.  The mortgage owner assesses the chances of a default and whether allowing the borrower to settle their mortgage and obtain a release for less than the outstanding owed is better business than seeing the same borrower eventually lose their home to foreclosure and the resulting loss of value of the property.

I have spent a great deal of time familiarizing myself with the new HAFA program.  I have also created a Frequently Asked Questions document to help anybody considering this alternative understand it better.  We also have started to build a website addressing the options for homeowners who wish to avoid foreclosure.  The first site is for Indianapolis metro homeowners and it is called www.IndyHomeownerSolutions.com.  Check it out and let me know what questions you have. 

If you need to discuss short sales you will find every Realtor seems to have some designation that allows them to say they are a specialist.  The question to ask them is how many short sales have they successfully completed?  Veterans of this industry generally do not have the newest alphabet soup of default or short sale certifications after their names.  We have been too busy working in the trenches to have to pay out a lot of money for something we actually have the experience to  perform successfully.

Walk Aways And Short Sellers May Not Be Able To Escape The Tax Man

Monday, April 12th, 2010

There seems to be a lot of confusion about who gets to pay taxes when they sell their home with a short sale or complete a deed in lieu of foreclosure.  The confusion started in 2007 when the Mortgage Forgiveness  Debt Act was passed and offered a key to the lock that had stalled homeowners trying to get out from an underwater mortgage.  Basically, through 2012, the act provides a pass from tax liability for mortgage debt forgiveness.  Formerly, if a mortgage holder forgave part of the debt, a taxable event ensued.  I was involved in numerous potential sales that the ensuing taxation of this forgiveness ended up stopping the owner from proceeding with a sale…actually choosing to allow a foreclosure on their record instead of the tax liability they could not pay.

So, this is a good law with some built in safeguards that limit the ability for certain more speculative borrowers to enjoy its benefits.  As anybody who has read much of my writing knows, I have a problem with the government providing assistance to people in states where so much phantom equity was created, who then borrowed against this equity and bought investment properties in states where prices stayed affordable.  This happened a lot and I witnessed it.  I also heard stories of phantom equity being used for paying off credit card debt and taking of vacations.  

Buying an investment property or paying off debt with funds later forgiven by a lender (or now the government) should be a taxable event.  And it is a good idea to reinforce that there are exceptions to this law and in these types of cases, logic wins.  I write this after talking to a business contact in one of these situations who firmly believes they are going to be able to complete a short sale on an investment property purchased with phantom equity…and under the new HAFA short sale program sell the original property with no tax burden!  It just does not work that way..and it shouldn’t!

The following is an outline of the exceptions with much more detail available here:

 A cash-out refinance where the money was spent on something not housing related, then the borrower got in trouble and lost their home to a foreclosure or short sale, will owe the IRS.

• The IRS will forgive tax liability only on money from home-equity loans that was spent to improve the property.

• Anyone who lost a vacation home or investment property to foreclosure or short sale will owe taxes

• Multi-million dollar homes  are always subject to tax.

What Is This Shadow Inventory of Foreclosed Homes?

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

One does not need to spend much time searching for information on foreclosures to discover what those of us in the industry already know.

There are a lot of homes sitting vacant and apparently in a state of default that no legal action has taken place to create a foreclosure.

And, nobody seems to know how many.

There is a lot of speculation as to why this is occuring.

The chart to the right shows three different attempts to track the amount of homes actually owned by banks.  This is another metric outside of the vacant homes not being foreclosed on metric.  I borrowed this from a very good blog post in the Wall Street Journal that tells the story of the shadow inventory statistically from the perspective of three different record keepers.

Mainly due to government internvetion, spurred on by the simple fact that the majority of the mortgage market is now government controlled, many different options are being tried to stop or avoid foreclosures.  In many cases I have seen, these interventions have not stopped the clock from ticking on completing a foreclosure unless successful modifications or short sales occur within a time that allows cancellation of the foreclosure.  As verified by the charts above..the banks did slow down their prosecution of foreclosures in 2009.   The number of vacant homes support that.  In 2010 we are seeing the discovery that homes are vacant, and the determination that the occupant is not a bona-fide tenant under the Protecting Tenants Act, causing the banks to proceed with a new amount of urgency.  There are no available statistics to support this..it is based on observations gathered from our marketplaces and national industry groups of which I am a participant.  I think it is fair to assume that a homeowner who figures out they will not qualify for a modification, and chooses to not hassle with a short sale (or even know the option exists), will often make plans to move before they have a foreclosure on their credit record.

This one theme continues to be seen.  The vacant houses.  Just ask anybody you know if they have a vacant home on their street. Is it being maintained?  These are the likely homes of the future in REO that are not in anybody’s count. This is also why I do not know of any markets in America where valuations should be assuming much increase in value.  There is still to many homes that need to be sold distressed.  There is no government modifications or short sales for vacant homes.  What there should be is the ability to accelerate the foreclosure when it is determined a home is in default and vacant.  The value slides quickly when a vacant home sits vacant and maintenance is lacking. 

It would be nice to see a different perspective on this issue.  One of saving the neighborhoods by deciding to stop trying to turn around the train that has already left the station.  Lets identify these vacant, defaulting properties and expedite them through foreclosure and sale to a new mortgage holder who will help the community by instilling pride of ownership back to the property.

Are The Banks Following The Law?

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Short sales…everybody has them on their mind these days.  The incidents of short sales are going to be more volumnious in areas where the real housing bubble burst.  Florida has a real demand.  Indiana’s is not quire as common.  The reason…ot that many people in Indiana ended up losing 25% or more of the value of their homes.  Short sales in Indiana should, by reason, be easier to accomplish because in all likelihood they do not involve as much money.

I am not sure how many people who get involved in short sales in Indiana are aware that last year consumer protection legislation was signed into law by Governor Daniels.  Indiana H>B> 1176 contains provisions that became law in July 2009 requiring mortgage servicers to acknowledge and respond to short sales within certain time frames.

This law requires creditors, servicers, or creditors agents must acknowledge written short sale offers within 10 business days and the servicer must accept or reject a borrower-submitted offer no later than 30 days after receipt of the offer.   If you enjoy reading the actual law, here is a link to the language.

I have read this and could dribble on about questions that come to mind for me and no amount of research I am able to do seems to provide answers.  The two primary questions is the requirement that the written offer qualifies as a “qualified written request” under RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act”.  The second is does this law allow for counter offers in the post 30 day period.  It would seem not.

I will update this blog as I discover these answers.  It may be that, like many laws, they have been left to interpretation and ultimatly the courts to decide.  Nevertheless, the most important thing to know is how to file a complaint if your short sale request is ignored in Indiana.   There is an on-line complaint form that can be filed with the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions (DFI). The DFI uses the complaints to track and establish patterns with certain lenders and use regulatory authority to investigate the complaint.  Additionally, the Homeowner Protection Unit of the Indiana Attorney General has enforcement authority over the complaints. When completing the form, the complaints should be filed with the DFI, and the field that the Homeowner Protection Unit should investigate marked (Field #18 on the Indiana complaint).

So, in your experience, has the implementation of this law helped?

I Really Can’t Believe This Was Still Happening…

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

From the Realtor Association of Greater Fort Myers and the Beach, Inc.

Home Short Sale Flips Nixed
 

It may get tougher for investors to flip short sales as Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund notified its 6,000 member lawyers this week that it will not insure deals made with a popular, but controversial, method of closing flips of short sales. The Orlando-based fund is a major underwriter for lawyers who write title insurance in Florida. The deals in question involve options with homeowners for “the exclusive right to purchase their property for a period of time.” The investor negotiates a short sale with the mortgage holder by convincing it that the price it is offering is the market value of the property. The investor then finds a buyer for a much higher price. The sales happen simultaneously, and the investor pockets the difference.
 
The problem is that the original lender is not told that the buyer is flipping the property on the same day for thousands more than the lender has been told is the market value of the property. The fund’s decision could have a major effect on short sale flips because many investors use lawyers to close deals when traditional title companies won’t.
 

Duh….lets see..fraud was one of the big things that caused the problems we have today.  It is what fed the whole system to allow the investment bankers to sell more and more mortgage backed securities.  So, apparently, there are still a lot of folks who still are able to game the system.  If you had asked me I would of told you that you could not pull this off in the world we now live in.  Apparently I was wrong.

Home Short Sale Flips Will Be Much Tougher

Monday, June 15th, 2009

As they should be…

I really am a free enterprise guy, but like in so many crisis situations, the vultures start to circle and sometimes they actually kill their prey, versus just looking for the carcasses.  Today’s big idea is short sales will allow you to avoid the stain of a foreclosure on your credit, and in some cases these plans can be approved and actually provide benefits to all parties.  Much of the issues we originally saw that led to the early stages of the foreclosure crisis were rooted in an environment that allowed fraud to be an option.  Fraud ended up costing all of us, via bailouts, lots of money and seem to be forgotten and not mentioned as much today.  Fraud now seems to be finding a new friend in short sales.

The bottom line in a short sale is not to sell the home for less than it is worth, but less than the outstanding mortgage indebtedness.  Short sale flips essentially take us back to the flips of old where no improvements were made, and a buyer somehow ponyed up and paid over market value for the property.  Then the seller split the proceeds of this sale all around and the new buyer never made a payment.

With short sales, the same scheme can develop..except now the seller has to convince the bank to take a loss on their mortgage.  As we all know, the bank is likely using taxpayer funds now so the  loss is essentially out of all of our pockets.  Therefore, we should all be glad to see that short sale flips are being stopped in their tracks.  Here is the news from the Tampa Tribune.

TAMPA – June 12, 2009 – It may be a bit tougher now for investors to flip short sales for big profits.

Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund notified its 6,000 member lawyers this week that it will not insure deals made with a popular – but controversial – method for closing flips of short sales. A short sale occurs when a mortgage holder agrees to allow a home to sell for less than the mortgage balance so that foreclosure can be avoided.

The Orlando-based fund is a major underwriter for lawyers who write title insurance in Florida. In a letter to lawyers, the fund said it has become aware of short sale programs advertised on the Internet that promise to make investors lots of money with little or no work.

The letter says they involve investors entering option deals with homeowners for “the exclusive right to purchase their property for a period of time.”

The investor negotiates a short sale with the mortgage holder by convincing it that the price it is offering is the market value of the property. The investor then finds a buyer for a much higher price. The sales happen simultaneously, and the investor pockets the difference.

The problem is that “the original lender is not told that the buyer is flipping the property on the same day for thousands more than the lender has been told is the market value of the property,” the letter states.

The fund’s decision could have a major effect on short sale flips because many investors use lawyers to close deals when traditional title companies won’t.

The option contract method has been gaining steam as a way to work off inventory in a bad real estate market.

Critics say mortgage holders are misled and don’t realize they could be selling for more. Some real estate agents and buyers complain that the option contracts lock some buyers out of the market. That’s because some types of loans forbid flips.

Some lawyers have raised concerns that sellers may have to pay the difference later.

But proponents say investors can make money and homeowners can avoid foreclosure. They say mortgage holders would lose even more money if they foreclosed on the home.

Copyright © 2009 Tampa Tribune, Fla., Shannon Behnken. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.